检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市中医医院,上海200071 [2]上海曙光医院,上海201203
出 处:《中国医药导报》2013年第32期109-113,共5页China Medical Herald
基 金:上海市卫生局中医药科研基金项目(编号2010QL030A)
摘 要:目的研究针药结合方案在治疗盆腔炎性疾病后遗症中的效果优势。方法入组180例符合盆腔炎性疾病后遗症的患者,随机分为三组进行疗效对比,三组分别为针药组、中药组和西药组,每组各60例。分别治疗3个月,观察治疗前后肝肾功能、血常规、盆腔B超以及不良反应,并比较三组在治愈率、总有效率及症状积分等方面的差异。结果①治愈率和总有效率:针药组(96.7%)与中药组(91.7%)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),针药组与西药组(61.7%)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),中药组与西药组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②症状积分比较:针药组与中药组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),针药组与西药组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),中药组与西药组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③下腹痛症状总有效率比较:针药组(96.7%)和中药组(93.3%)均优于西药组(80.0%)(均P<0.05),针药组与中药组无明显差异。④不良反应比较:针药组和中药组均无不良反应,西药组有3例。结论在提高盆腔炎性疾病后遗症的治愈率方面,针药结合治疗的综合治疗方案较中药口服和西药口服方案更有发展潜力。Objective To research the efficacy advantage in the treatment of sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease (SPID)with acupuncture and Chinese herb medicine.Methods 180 cases complying with the diagnostic criteria of SPID were randomized into three groups in order to compare the effects.The three groups were acupuncture and drugs group,Chinese herb medicine group (CHM goup) and western medicine group.The three groups were treated for 3 months respectively,with 60 cases in each group.Liver and kidney function,blood,pelvic ultrasound and adverse reactions of the three groups before and after treatment were observed.Then the three groups' differences on curing rate,total effective rate,symptom scores and others were compared.Results ①Curing rate and total effective rate:there was no significant difference between acupuncture and drugs group (96.7%) and CHM group (91.7%) (P > 0.05).Significant difference between acupuncture and drugs group and western medicine group (61.7%) (P < 0.05),and significant difference between CHM group and western medicine group (P <0.05) were seen.②Comparison of the symptom scores:there was significant difference between acupuncture and drugs group and CHM group (P < 0.05),significant difference between acupuncture and drugs group and western medicine group (P <0.05),as well as significant difference between CHM group and western medicine group (P < 0.05).③Comparison of the total effective rate of the symptom of lower abdominal pain:acupuncture and drugs group (96.7%) and CHM group (93.3%) were better than western medicine group (80.0%) (all P < 0.05).There was no significant difference between acupuncture and drugs group and CHM group.④Comparison of the adverse reaction:there was no adverse reaction in acupuncture and drugs group and CHM group,but there were 3 cases in western medicine group.Conclusion Acupuncture and drugs therapeutic schedule is better than the others on the respect of p
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.136.11.217