检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江西省九江市第三人民医院CT室,江西九江332000 [2]江西省九江市第一人民医院CT室,江西九江332000
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第34期148-149,151,共3页China Modern Doctor
基 金:江西省科技计划项目(2012ZBBG70016)
摘 要:目的比较低剂量与常规剂量CT引导下胸部穿刺受检者的X线有效辐射剂量的差异。方法低剂量与常规剂量CT引导下胸部穿刺病例各100例,低剂量组扫描参数为36 mAs,110 kV,常规剂量组为90mAs,130 kV。根据CT机自动记录的受检者剂量长度乘积(DLP)计算X线有效辐射剂量(ED),并进行统计学处理。结果低剂量组与常规剂量组DLP分别为(50.45±23.79)mGy·cm和(240.59±98.87)mGy·cm,ED分别为(0.72±0.38)mSV和(3.36±1.39)mSv,两组DLP和ED的差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论低剂量CT引导下胸部穿刺,可明显降低受检者的X线有效辐射剂量,符合放射防护最优化的要求。Objective To compare the difference of the effective radiation dose in the CT-guided chest centesis between low-dose and convention-dose. Methods A total of 200 cases of chest centesis were collected and divided into two groups: low-dose group and convention-dose group. Low-dose group (36 mAs, 110 kV) was used in 100 cases, and convention-dose group (90 mAs, 130 kV) was used in anotherl00 cases. The effective dose (ED) was calculated by dose length product (DLP) automatically recorded by the CT machine. And the statistical analyses on ED and DLP from two groups were performed. Results The DLP values for low dose group and convention-dose group were (50.45+23.79) and (240.59+98.87) mGy'cm, respectively, and the ED values were (0.72+0.38) and (3.36+ 1.39) mSv, respectively. The difference between two groups was statistical significant (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion Low- dose of CT-guided chest centesis can reduce the radiation dose for the patient, and meet the requirements of optimization of radiological protection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249