检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余筱慧
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区鹿寨县人民医院妇产科护理部,广西鹿寨545600
出 处:《中国现代医生》2013年第35期142-143,共2页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨产前干预对单纯糖筛查异常孕妇妊娠结局的干预效果。方法收集进行产检孕妇156例,随机分为干预组和对照组,各78例。两组均进行定期常规产前检查,干预组同时进行产前干预,比较两组孕妇妊娠期的并发症及围生儿并发症。结果干预组孕产妇剖宫产、胎儿宫内窘迫、羊水过多、胎膜早破发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。干预组巨大儿发生率明显低于对照组。结论产前干预是有效预防GCT异常孕妇发生不良妊娠结局的一个好方法,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the influence on pregnancy outcome of pregnant women with abnormal pure glucose screening by prenatal intervention. Methods All 156 cases of pregnant woman done antenatal examination were randomly divided into intervention group and control group, there were 78 cases in each group. Two groups were done routine prenatal examination, intervention group were treated with prenatal intervention in the same time, the pregnan- cy complications and perinatal complications were compared with two groups. Results The incidence of cesarean delivery, fetal distress, polyhydramnios, premature rupture of membranes in intervention group were significantly lower than that in control group (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of macrosomia in intervention group was lower than that in control group. Conclusion Prenatal intervention is a good way to effectively prevent occurrence of GCT in pregnant women with abnormal adverse pregnancy outcomes, it is worthy of clinical application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.252.232