检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何有琴[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省医药卫生科技信息研究所医学情报研究中心,济南250062
出 处:《中华医学科研管理杂志》2013年第6期372-376,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management
基 金:山东省软科学研究计划(2011RKGA8012、2009RKA015)
摘 要:科技成果鉴定是科技成果评价的方式之一,在过去时段里发挥了重要的成果鉴别与促进作用。但是,从现阶段暴露出的种种问题来看,其本质原因是人才评价与成果评价的利益捆绑,导致成果鉴定过程中的非规范性操作。科技成果评价试点中第三方的引入,是一种新的尝试。除做好项目结题验收、专家库建设、第三方评价机构监督和采用双盲评审制度外,更重要的是从政策的高度卸载科技成果评价背负的利益包袱。Appraisal of scientific and technological achievements is a kind of evaluation that have played an important role in the classification and promotion oi research outcome. However, prob- lem of non-normative practice has arisen out of the appraisal process. This is because it not only asses- ses the research outcome but also is closely related with the interests of the researchers. Introduction of third-party evaluation into the appraisal of scientific achievements is a new attempt that has been proved effective. Key steps in the appraisal includes the final evaluation of project, construction of the pool of experts, third-party monitor and double-blind review system, and most importantly, unbinding of personal interests with the appraisal.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3