检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董安有[1] 李欢欢[1] 陈致宏[1] 谭忠富[1] 鞠立伟[1]
机构地区:[1]华北电力大学电力能源经济与环境研究所,北京102206
出 处:《华东电力》2013年第12期2595-2601,共7页East China Electric Power
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71071053;71201056)~~
摘 要:优化发电资源联合调度对于电力系统经济运行、实现节能减排目标有着重要意义。为比较不同调度目标和约束条件下多类型发电资源调度模型的经济和环境效益,综合考虑了机组出力、发电资源、污染排放等方面的约束条件,分别以煤耗量最低和污染物排放量最小为目标建立了合同电量、理想节能发电调度及两种调度方式相互合作的调度优化模型。在此基础上,提出了发电资源调度效益评价模型,利用风电、水电、火电机组实际数据进行算例仿真。算例结果显示,合作模式下的发电资源联合调度优化模型能综合合同电量、理想节能发电调度模型的优点,明显减少污染物排放,产生最少的弃风、弃水量,整体发电利润分别高出另外两种模型5.5%和1.5%,从而获取更高的综合效益。To optimize joint scheduling of generation resources is of great significance for the economic operation of power system and the energy-saving and emission-reduction targets. This paper compares the economic and environ- mental benefits of multi-type generation resources scheduling models under different scheduling objectives and con- straints, and takes into account the constraints of unit output, generation resources and pollution emission. Then the scheduling optimization models are established for the contract power, ideal energy-saving generation and the joint scheduling. Thereupon the evaluation model is presented for power generation resource scheduling effectiveness, then the data of wind power, hydropower and thermal power units is used in the simulation calculation. The results show that the joint scheduling optimization model can significantly reduce the discharge of pollutants, produce the least abandoned wind and water, and that the overall power generation profit is 5.5% and 1.5% higher than the other two models respectively, obtaining more comprehensive benefits.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.3.240