检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《岩土工程学报》2013年第12期2317-2321,共5页Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
摘 要:当前中国工程界对细粒类土的分类存在两种不同标准,一种是按液限wL和塑性指数Ip构成的塑性图进行分类,一种是按单一塑性指数Ip进行分类,并且这两种分类方法的分类指数Ip的确定标准也不相同,造成了使用上的混乱。对中国细粒类土的两种分类标准的历史由来进行了探寻,并与国际上通行的细粒类土的分类标准进行了分析比较,最后对中国细颗粒土分类标准的统一途径提出了建议。There are two kinds of classification systems for fine soil in China. One is based on the plasticity chart by means of the liquid limit and the plasticity index. The other is only based on the plasticity index. Furthermore, the two systems have different standard for determining the plasticity index, and some confusion is caused in engineering practice. The historical causes for the two kinds of classification systems for fine soil in China are investigated. The current international classification standards or systems for fine soil are analyzed and compared. Some suggestions are proposed for the unified classification system for fine soil in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.22.209.115