绿屋会议改革研究——构建WTO决策机制中的“埃俄罗斯之风”与“忒弥斯之秤”  

Research on Reforming Green Room——Reestablishing “the Wind of Aeolus” and“ the Scale of Themis” in WTO Decision Making System

作　　者：翁里[1] 唐卓然[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学光华法学院,浙江杭州310008

出　　处：《时代法学》2013年第6期73-85,共13页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：2012年教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目"技术移民立法与引进海外人才"(项目批准号:12YJA820040)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要："绿屋会议"作为WTO非正式决策机制的重要代表,在WTO决策机制的运行历史中曾经起到了重要作用,使得多边谈判的效率得到了最大程度的提高。其前身G18对推动GATS、TRIMS和TPIPS谈判的达成即明证〔1〕。尽管在提高WTO决策效率上有目共睹,绿屋却因为对参与成员方的有限选择,对大多数成员方的强制排除,以及决策程序不透明等因素而受到广泛诟病,甚至获得了"黑屋"之名〔2〕。而绿屋会议本身又是作为WTO非正式决策制度而在WTO法律体系之外发挥作用,其存留与否以及改革方向对于WTO决策制度的效用发挥乃至新一轮多边体系的建立所起的影响可谓至关重要。As a significant representative of WTO informal decision-making system, green room has produced great influence in the operation of WTO decision-making, and enhanced the efficiency of multilateral negotiation to maximum extent. The improvement effect of its predecessor G18 in the successful negotiation of GATS, TRIMS and TRIPS is a clear proof. Although its impact in increase efficiency of WTO decision-making is obvious to all, green room has been widely criticized and even gets the notoriety as ＂black room＂ because of its limited choice of member states, the exclusion of major member states and its absence of transparency. While green room itself is outside the WTO formal legal system and functions as WTO informal decision-making system, its existence or not is extremely vital to WTO decision-making and even the construction of a new multilateral system.

关 键 词：绿屋会议 WTO决策机制 埃俄罗斯之风 忒弥斯之秤(3] 

分 类 号：D996[政治法律—经济法学]