不同的治疗方法对乙型病毒性肝炎治疗效果的探讨  

Approaching the Therapeutic Effect of Viral Hepatitis Type B by Using Different Treatment Methods

作　　者：王宝玲[1] 盖飞月[1] 匡霞[2] 

机构地区：[1]河南职工医学院,郑州450003 [2]开封市第一人民医院,开封475000

出　　处：《河南职工医学院学报》2000年第4期7-8,共2页Journal of Henan Medical College For Staff and Workers

摘　　要：目的 :进一步探讨不同的治疗方法对乙型病毒性肝炎 (简称乙肝 )的治疗效果。方法 :设置治疗组和对照组 ,治疗组又分为抗病毒治疗 (干扰素 +胸腺肽 )和改善微循环等综合治疗为治疗一组 ;治疗二组为用干扰素和改善微循环的方法 ;治疗三组为胸腺肽和改善微循环的方法 ;对照组为单用改善微循环的方法 ;疗程为 3— 6个月。结果 :治疗各组乙肝标志物转阴率均高于对照组 ,e抗原受体治疗各组转阴率均 >5 3 % ,而对照组为 2 5 % ,二者具有显著差异。治疗各组的临床治愈好转率 >74% ,治疗组为 44 % ,二者具有高度显著差异。结论 :乙肝应在直接和(或 )间接抗病毒治疗的基础上 ,改善微循环 ,提高乙肝的临床治愈好转率。Objective Further approaching the therapeutic effect of viral hepatitis type B (Hepatitis B) by using different treatment methods. Methods Establishing treatment group and contraxt group. The treatment group is divided into 3 groups: to group, We adopts the combined method of including antiviral treatment (interferont Thymosin) and improving microcirculation. To group 2 We use the method of interferon and improving microcirculation. To group 3 We employs the method of Thymosin and improving microcirculation. Howerer, Contrcost group only adopts the methed of improving microcirculation, and its course of treatment is 3-6 months. Result Transform rate of hepatitis B markers in each group of treatment is higher than that in contrast group. Transform rate of each group of treatment in e: antign aueptor is more than 53%, while in contrast group it is only 25%; There is obrious difference between the treatment and the contrast group. Clinican cure rate in each treatment group is over 74%, while in contrast group it is just 44%; Obviously, the two groups also have great difference. Conclusion Hepatitis B should improve microcirculation to raise clinical cure rate of it on the basis of direct or indirect antiviral treatment.

关 键 词：乙型肝炎 疗效 干扰素 胸腺肽 微循环改善 

分 类 号：R512.620.5[医药卫生—内科学]