检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李凡[1]
机构地区:[1]南开大学历史学院,天津300071
出 处:《日本问题研究》2013年第4期1-6,共6页Japanese Research
摘 要:自称日本"海外"学者原贵美惠近几年发表了许多有关东亚领土纠纷问题研究成果,引起学界关注。作者提出东亚地区领土纠纷问题出现,都与美国战后主导《旧金山对日媾和条约》有关,是美国设置于有关国家之间的"楔子",便于美国实施未来亚太战略。关于东亚领土纠纷问题如何解决,作者提出采用奥兰群岛模式,在多国框架内解决等。笔者认为,原贵美惠的研究成果确实比较新异,但并未脱离日本学者局限,依靠美国解决日本与周边国家间领土纠纷,是日本朝野上下的共同选择。Japanese "overseas" scholar Dr. Kimie Hara has published many research results about territorial disputes in East Asia in recent years, which attract broad attentions in academia. Dr. Kimie Hara thinks that the origin of territorial disputes in East Asia is of great relevance to the "San Francisco Peace Treaty with Japan"-a "wedge" which was dominated and set in between the countries by the United States to implement its Asia-Pacific strategy in the future. On the issue of territorial disputes in East Asia, she puts forward the land Islands Settlement as a Resolution Model in a multilateral framework. This article has attempted to conduct that her research is original in choice of subject. However, it could not be out of limitation of the Japanese scholars. It is a common choice across the Japan political spectrum to rely on the United States to solve the territorial disputes between Japan and its neighbors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222