反叛与戡乱:中唐河北之乱与平乱诸军述论  

Riot and Anti-riot: A Review of the Riot in Hebei and Anti-riot Troops in the Midst of the Tang Dynasty

作　　者：朱德军[1] 耿占军[2] 

机构地区：[1]西安文理学院文化与旅游学院,陕西西安710065 [2]西安文理学院长安历史文化研究中心,陕西西安710065

出　　处：《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第6期68-79,共12页Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(13XZS012);陕西省教育厅社会科学规划项目(11JK0219);中国博士后科学基金第四批特别资助项目(201104674)

摘　　要：中唐以后,部分河北藩镇,或公然突破"封疆",或悍然世袭节帅,其"僭越之举",往往招致中央无情的讨伐。通过对其讨伐战况分析认为:一、戡乱河北最重要的军力来源是河北藩镇与中原藩镇;二、在戡乱河北的频度和规模上,河北藩镇均占有明显的优势,中原藩镇次之;三、戡乱河北的战效上,尤以"河北四镇"与"中原三镇"为著,两者几乎平分秋色,若结合他们出兵频度和规模进行综合考量,中原藩镇或许更胜一筹,河北藩镇未能取得与之相称的战争效果。After the midst of the Tang Dynasty, some military governors in Hebei broke the boundary of their ＂granted territory＂ openly or flagrantly succeeded the marshalship. Such ＂arrogating deeds＂ were frequently suppressed by the central court. An analysis of effects of the suppressing wars shows that the main anti-rioting troops came from military governors in Hebei and Central China, that the military governors in Hebei took prominently more advantages in frequency and scale of suppression, and that the military governors in the two regions took the lead in achievements of the battles, the two matching almost equally. However, an investigation of the frequency and scale of sending troops reveals that the military governors were superior to those in Hebei, hence obtaining better effects of war.

关 键 词：中唐时期 河北藩镇 藩镇反叛与戡乱 

分 类 号：K242.3[历史地理—历史学]