论WTO的司法积极主义及发展中国家的应对  

On Judicial Activism in WTO and lts Reaction of the Developing Countries

作　　者：吴峰[1] 

机构地区：[1]南通航运职业技术学院,江苏南通226010

出　　处：《武夷学院学报》2013年第4期28-33,共6页Journal of Wuyi University

基　　金：江苏省高校"青蓝工程"项目资助(苏教师[2012]39号)

摘　　要：WTO争端解决中的司法积极主义符合司法权的一般规律。而不适当地"司法造法"无疑会扩大成员方的权利和义务范围,侵犯成员方的决策自由。鉴于强化WTO的立法权或者加强对争端解决报告通过的控制由于缺乏实践基础而无法实施,发展中国家成员方应提高对司法理性的认识,在重视对外交和磋商程序利用的同时,积极推动WTO争端解决机构司法哲学理念的转变,并在DSU中明确设立"先例"制度,以加强对司法积极主义的实际约束和控制。＂Judicial activism＂ in the WTO dispute settlement is consistent with the general rule of the development of jurisdiction. But the inappropriately ＂judicial lawmaking＂ wiU undoubtedly expand the scope of the rights and obligations of the WTO Members, which will seriously violate the Members＇ freedom of making trade decisions. Beeause of lacking practical foundation in strengthening the legislative power of WTO or reinforcing the procedural control on passing dispute settlement reports, it can not achieve positive results. WTO devel- oping members should improve the rational understanding of the character of judicial procedure and put more emphasis on the use of diplomatic and negotiating procedures. Besides, in order to strengthen the practical constraints and control of judicial activism, WTO should change the judicial philosophy of the Dispute Settlement Body; pursue a more ＂judicial restraint＂ judicial philosophy and establish ＂stare deeisis＂ in its legal system.

关 键 词：世界贸易组织 争端解决 司法积极主义 司法克制 遵循先例 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]