“腐败零容忍”的逻辑悖论:一个基于染缸效应的理论分析  

Logical Paradox of “Zero Tolerance of Corruption”:A Theoretical Study Based on Dye Vat Effect

作　　者：李怀[1,2] 邓韬[1] 

机构地区：[1]东北财经大学经济与社会发展研究院,大连116025 [2]东北财经大学产业组织与企业组织研究中心,大连116025

出　　处：《天津商业大学学报》2013年第6期3-9,共7页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(2010CIB03)

摘　　要："腐败零容忍"作为国外成功经验之一,在我国近年来的反腐工作中有着非常重要的影响。然而,在染缸效应的大前提下,"腐败零容忍"在很大程度上非但未能解决腐败问题,反而造成了一方面"廉官"不断蜕化为"贪官",另一方面"贪官"伙同非法寻租人共同继续腐蚀或驱赶"廉官"的局面,从而加速了染缸效应的裂变式扩散,为反腐工作增加了难度。通过对我国染缸效应影响下"腐败零容忍"态度的逻辑解析,给出了我国权力腐败问题长期得不到有效解决、不断扩散的根源:染缸效应的结论。在此基础上还讨论了染缸效应在其形成与发展的逻辑结构中与"腐败零容忍"发生矛盾的方面,最后提出缓解我国权力腐败现状的相关政策建议。＂Zero tolerance of corruption＂ , as a piece of successful experience in foreign countries, has recently had paramount impacts on anti-corruption work in China. However, based on the major premise of dye vat effect, ＂zero tolerance of corruption＂ has failed to deal with the problem of corruption to a great extent, instead, on one hand, it has been causing ＂honest officials＂ to degenerate into ＂corrupt officials＂ continually, on the other hand, ＂corrupt officials＂ has been colluding with illegal rent-seekers to taint or drive out ＂honest officials＂, which has been accelerating the rapid diffusion of dye vat effect and increasing the difficulty of anti-corruption. Based on the logical analysis of ＂zero tolerance of corruption＂, the paper drew the conclusion that dye vat effect was the root cause of why power corruption problems couldn＇ t be resolved effectively, but kept on proliferating in the long term in China. It also discussed the contradiction between logical structure of formation and development of dye vat effect and ＂zero tolerance of corruption＂, and put forward some suggestions of relieving the power corruption in China.

关 键 词：腐败零容忍 染缸效应 逻辑悖论 博弈分析 

分 类 号：F224.32[经济管理—国民经济]