检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学第三医院第二手术部,石家庄市050051
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2013年第23期85-86,共2页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:探讨改良清创术在肢体开放性创伤伤口的患者中的应用效果.方法:将我院2010年1月~2012年12月开放性外伤患者3513例随机分为对照组1688例和观察组1825例,对照组采用传统清创术,观察组伤后8h以内清创,采用改良清创术.比较两组患者Ⅰ期伤口愈合率和感染率.结果:观察组患者Ⅰ期伤口愈合率高于对照组(P<0.05),感染率低于对照组(P<0.05).结论:早期正确应用清创术,有利于创伤性伤口的Ⅰ期愈合,降低感染率,值得临床推广应用.Objective:To approach the effect by improving the debridement of the wound healing for open wound in limbs.Methods:3515 cases were randomly selected in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2012 in trauma patients with injured after debridement within 8 hours.1825 patients carried out the improved debridement were as the observation group.1688 patients wete the control group used traditional technology.To compare the infection rate and woand primary healing rate.Results:Patients in observation group with primary wound healing rate was higher than the control group (P < 0.05),the infection rate was lower than the control group (P < 0.05).Conclusion:Application of debridement in a correct an earlier way is in favor of trauma wound fist intension and decrease of infection rate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222