没收财产刑的宪法维度  

On the Perfection of Criminal Confiscation of Property

作　　者：詹红星[1] 

机构地区：[1]韶关学院法学院,广东韶关512005

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2013年第11期119-123,共5页Journal of Shaoguan University

基　　金：韶关市哲学社会科学规划课题"人权保障视野下的刑法和宪法关系研究"(Z2013001)阶段性成果

摘　　要：没收财产刑是以剥夺犯罪分子合法财产为内容的刑罚方法,它与宪法中保护财产权的规定是不矛盾的。为了遵循宪法的基本原则,我们必须采取以下措施完善没收财产刑:一是确定没收财产刑中财产的具体范围;二是废除全部没收制,实行比例没收制;三是构建犯罪人财产的调查和异议制度。The confiscation of property that is a sort of property-oriented penalties in our criminal punishment system does not conflict with the regulations on the protection of property rights in the constitution. In order to follow the basic principles of the constitution, we must take the following measures to perfect the confiscation of property. Firstly, we should determine the specific scope of the confiscation of property. Secondly we should abolish the full confiscation of property and implement the ratio confiscation of property. Thirdly, we should establish the investigation and objection system of property.

关 键 词：没收财产刑 财产权 宪法 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]