检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学旅游与城市管理学院,中国浙江杭州310018 [2]中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,中国吉林长春130102
出 处:《经济地理》2013年第12期189-194,共6页Economic Geography
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41071108);2013年度浙江省民政政策理论研究规划课题(ZMYB201316);浙江工商大学第四届青年人才基金项目(QY13-13;QY13-21)
摘 要:运用集对分析法从经济敏感性和应对能力对我国15个典型旅游城市的经济系统脆弱性进行测度。研究表明:各旅游城市经济系统普遍具有较高的应对能力,但系统敏感性差别较大,其中,武汉和济南由于经济敏感性较低,应对能力较高,表现为低脆弱性;厦门和广州因经济敏感性高、应对能力较低而处于高脆弱性等级。障碍因素分析表明,客源市场集中度、旅游外汇收入占旅游总收入比重、旅游总收入占GDP比重等敏感性因子,地方财政自给率、产业结构多样化指数等应对能力因子是影响各旅游城市经济脆弱性的关键因素。This paper establishes a vulnerability assessment model from the aspects of sensitivity and responding capacity by using the set pair analysis (SPA) to evaluate the economic vulnerability of 15 typical tourism cities in China. The results show that the typical tourism cities generally have higher coping capacities, but their sensitivities are very different. The economic vulnerability of Wuhan and Jinan are low because of their low sensitivity and higher responding capacity, while Shenzhen and Guangzhou are the most vulnerable cities because of their high sensitivity and low responding capacity. According to the factor analysis of obstacle degree, the indicators of sensitivity including proportion of total tourism income to GDP, proportion of foreign exchange earnings to the total tourism income and tourism market concentration, and the indicators of responding capacity including self-sufficiency rate of local finance and diversity index of industrial structure are the main obstacles to reduce the economic vulnerability of typical tourism cities in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222