迈向“言说”理性的法律会话推理  

Legal Conversational Reasoning Towards “Speaking”Ration

作　　者：彭榆琴[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学武汉学院,湖北武汉430070

出　　处：《政法论丛》2013年第6期44-49,共6页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2007年度国家社科基金项目"法律推理研究--语用学与语用逻辑的视角"(07BZX046)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：法律推理是理性的过程,具体而言是一种实践理性。法律实践是一种"言说"的实践,特别是在司法过程中,任何一个环节都离不开"言说"这种会话模式。法律推理的过程就是在法律会话实践中选择最适合结论的过程,它包括一定法律行为正当化的论证和相对于一定目的的最佳手段的确定。法律会话推理①正是从多主体"言说"角度寻找正当性的法律推理方法,是一种"言说着"的理性,其以话语为媒介,以法律当事人之间的会话沟通为方式,通过各方对话语意图理解找到解决问题的最佳行为方法,从而对推理结论进行正当性论证,这里的正当性建立在主体间性的基础上,因而具有主体间的可接受性和社会层面的合理性。Legal reasoning is a process of ration, to be specific, practical ration. Legal practice is a kind of ＂speaking＂ practice. Especially in the judicial process, any step should connect with ＂speaking＂, the conversation- al mode. The process of legal reasoning is the process to make appropriate choice in the legal conversation practice, which includes justified argument to some legal action and the determination of best choice according to some pur- pose. Legal conversational reasoning just the way to find justified choice from multi-speaking, which is ＂speaking＂ ration. Discourse as the medium and the legal parties＇ discourse as the way to communicate, all the legal parties find the best way to resolve the legal problem to argument the legitimacy. The legitimacy is constructed on the base of intersubjectivity, which is acceptable intersubjectivitily and reasonable socially.

关 键 词：言说 理性 会话 推理 

分 类 号：DF0-051[政治法律—法学理论]