检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:亢晶晶[1]
出 处:《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》2013年第6期63-68,共6页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:2012《刑事诉讼法》及《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则(试行)》继《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》之后对人民检察院在审前程序中适用非法证据排除规则作了相关的规定,这对于强化对侦查行为合法性的监督、保障犯罪嫌疑人的人权具有重要作用,但是当前的规定还是存在一些不足之处,这将制约其作用的发挥。因此,有必要对其进行"程序化",构建专门的听证程序,明确相关的程序性规定,增强其可操作性。Criminal Procedure Law enacted in 2012 and People's Procuratorate's Rule on Criminal Procedure following the Provisions on Eliminating Illegal Evidence in Dealing with Criminal Cases have made relevant provisions for people's procuratorate to eliminate illegal evidence in pretrial procedures, which plays an important role in strengthening the supervision of legitimacy of the investigative behaviors and protecting the criminal suspects' human right. However, their shortcomings are that they restrain procuratorate's role playing. Accordingly, it is necessary to procedurize them by establishing a special hearing procedure and making clear the related provision so as to increase their operability.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31