概念行政法学的传统、挑战及重估——以应受行政处罚行为的成立要件为例  

The Tradition,Challenge and Revaluation of Conceptual Administrative Jurisprudence

作　　者：熊樟林[1] 孟星宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,江苏南京211189

出　　处：《北京行政学院学报》2013年第6期84-89,共6页Journal of Beijing administration institute

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目(2013SJD820012)

摘　　要：20世纪以来,缘于实证行政法学的冲击,公法学界开始有意冷落概念行政法学。但是,这并不是概念行政法学本身的缺陷所致,而是因为我们现在并不具有使用这一方法的能力。实际上,概念行政法学具有实证行政法学所欠缺的对价值的评估方法,而实证行政法学却存在着用对物体的认识手段研究"人"的根本错误,因而,概念行政法学理应得到重估和重用。譬如,将其运用在"应受行政处罚行为成立要件"主题上,我们便可获得一个逻辑闭合、体系严谨的理论框架。Since the 20th century, due to the impact of empirical administrative jurisprudence, administrative law scholars began to leave out conceptual administrative jurisprudence intentionally, which isn＇ t due to intrinsic defects of conceptual administrative jurisprudence but scholars have no ability to use this method. In fact, conceptual administrative jurisprudence has a method to assess value that is lacking in empirical administrative jurisprudence while empirical administrative jurisprudence has a fundamental fault that it often applies some appraisal tools suitable form things to people. Therefore, conceptual administrative jurisprudence should be revaluated and reused. For example, if it can be applied to the research of constitution of administrative illegal action, we could obtain a theoretical framework with a closed logical and rigorous system.

关 键 词：概念行政法学 实证行政法学 行政处罚法 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]