检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范凌杰[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州大学,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2013年第4期39-42,共4页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:我国《老年人权益保障法》第26条确立了老年人任意监护制度,适应了人口老龄化问题突出、人权保障观念深化的时代背景,融入保障身心障碍者福利理念,弥补了老年人监护制度方面的立法空白。但是我国新确立的老年人任意监护制度仍存在受监护对象狭窄、缺乏具体实施办法、监护监督机制不健全等问题。针对我国老年人任意监护制度中存在的问题,该制度中关键的老年人委托监护合同与任意监护监督制度的配套规则亟需完善。Article 26 of China's "Protection Law for the Elderly" established the arbitrary guardianship system for the elderly, adapted to the historical background of highlighted problem of aging population and the deepen concept of human rights protection, integrated philosophy of securing benefits of the disabled, and made up for the legislative gaps in the guardianship system for the elderly. But there are still problems existed in our newly established system, such as the narrow ranges of objects under guardianship, the lack of concrete measures for implementation, non-perfect guardianship and monitoring mechanism and so on. For the problems, the supporting rules for the contract of entrusted guardianship for the elderly and the arbitrary guardianship and monitoring system are needed to be improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.32.191