对我国侵犯知识产权犯罪刑事立法系统性的考量  

Systematic Research on the Criminal Legislation of Crimes of Infringing on Intellectual Property Rights

作　　者：余高能[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北大学法学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第12期61-65,共5页Intellectual Property

摘　　要：我国关于侵犯知识产权犯罪的刑事立法存在两方面问题。第一,与相关部门法的衔接与协调有所欠缺;第二,系统性和完整性有待提高。从罪名设置看,未将反向假冒注册商标、冒充专利、非法实施他人专利以及非法出租侵权复制品等行为犯罪化。从构成要件的设置看,侵犯商标权犯罪未将服务商标纳入保护范围,且对行为方式的规定不够全面;侵犯著作权罪在主观方面要求过于苛刻,客观方面行为方式的规定偏窄;各罪定罪标准,尤其是犯罪数额的规定不尽合理且缺乏统一性。从法定刑设置看,刑种较为单一,缺乏针对性和明确性,罪刑结构也不尽合理,缺乏协调性。China＇s current criminal law against crimes of infringing on intellectual property rights has two problems. First, it is not always in consistent with relevant laws. Second, it is incomplete and unreasonable in some aspects. Acts like illegal use of patent of another, patent fraud, lease of illegal copy products are not criminalized. Service trademarks are not protected by criminal law. Purpose of making profits is strictly required to establish the offense of infifngement on copyright. Amount of illegal gains is not only unduly emphasized as a key element of crime but also unclearly defined.

关 键 词：知识产权 刑事立法 服务商标 犯罪数额 犯罪目的 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]