价值、理性与权力:“邻避式抗争”的实践逻辑——基于一个核电站备选厂址的案例分析  

Value,Ration and Power:The Practical Logic of the "NIMBY" Contention

作　　者：张乐[1] 童星[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学,威海264209 [2]南京大学,南京210093

出　　处：《上海行政学院学报》2014年第1期84-95,共12页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"社会管理创新与社会体制改革研究"(11&ZD028);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"我国核电扩张背景下的风险邻避及其治理研究"(11YJC840069);山东大学自主创新基金优秀青年项目"重大核电项目的社会风险防范与管理机制创新"(2013SKYQ002)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：本文通过核电站备选厂址的案例揭示"邻避抗争"动力机制。笔者认为,推动"邻避"事件不断发展的动力既不是单纯的经济利益分配不公所激化的矛盾,也不仅仅是环境权益维护者对行政权力独大的抗议,更不是居民无理性的情感宣泄,而是被一个由"价值-理性-权力"构成的复杂链条的交互力量所主导。在这一过程中,不同行动者在其价值观指引下对核电站选址问题进行着迥异的性质认定,为后续的行动提供"基调"和必要的情感准备,而行动者在其理性权衡下做出的行动策略又起到了再平衡的作用,最终权力间的相互制约性运作对整个"邻避"事件的结果产生了决定性的影响。In this paper, author use the case of the nuclear alternative site to reveal the dynamic mechanism of the ＂NIMBY contention＂. The author believes that the power which promote ＂NIMBY＂ event to the continuous development is neither purely economic contradictions, nor just the conflict between environmental rights defenders and government, more than residents irrational emotional catharsis. It is dominated by an interaction force which generated by a value - rational - powers chain. In this process, different actors made a huge difference judgment about the location problem under the guidance of their values. It readies the ＂tone＂ and the necessary emotional for follow-up action. In the whole proeess, the action strategy that actors had made in their rational considerations has played a rebalancing role. The power constraints operation had a decisive influence on the outcome of the event.

关 键 词：邻避冲突 社会抗争 环境风险 核电站 

分 类 号：C916[经济管理]