Analysis of China's Production- and Consumption-Based CO_2 Emission Inventories  

中国生产型和消费型二氧化碳排放清单分析（英文）

作　　者：FU Jiafeng A Rouna WANG Meng KONG Shanshan GAO Qingxian 付加锋[4] 阿柔娜[5] 王蒙[6] 孔珊珊 高庆先 

机构地区：[1]Center of Climate Change, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing 100012, China [2]Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, Duke University, NC, USA [3]College of Economics, Hebei University, Baoding 071000, China [4]中国环境科学研究院气候变化中心,北京100012 [5]杜克大学尼古拉斯环境学院,美国北卡罗来纳州 [6]河北大学经济学院,保定071000

出　　处：《Journal of Resources and Ecology》2013年第4期293-303,共11页资源与生态学报（英文版）

基　　金：the National Basic Research Program of China(973 Program)(No.2012CB955904);National Natural Science Foundation(No.40905062)

摘　　要：China, as the biggest GHG emitter and the largest developing country, has been urged by international society to take responsibilities for reducing GHG, especially in the post-Kyoto commitment period. Currently, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change （UNFCCC） assigns the responsibility to parties who produce the pollution, using the production-based GHG emissions inventories. In this article, we analyze the difference between China＇s production- and consumption- based emission inventories and conclude that consumption-based GHG emission inventories are preferred; as it is fair that whoever consumes the emission should pay for their consumption. In addition, in order to consider environmental justice, policy-makers should take both economic and administrative measures to support poor provinces for reducing C02 emissions.中国作为最大的发展中国家,已经成为二氧化碳第一排放大国,因此,国际社会开始敦促中国在后京都时期承担更多减排责任。现阶段,《联合国气候变化框架条约》使用生产型二氧化碳排放清单,这就意味着它将减排责任分配给了污染制造者。本文比较并分析了中国的生产型和消费型二氧化碳排放清单,并认为消费型的二氧化碳排放清单更为公平合理,产品的消费者应该为他们所购买的产品中隐含的碳排放付费。此外,为了考虑公平问题,政府应采取全面的经济政策和行政手段扶持经济落后的省份进行减排。

关 键 词：CO2 emissions inventories China economic input-output analysis carbon tax 

分 类 号：F12[经济管理—世界经济]