检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]财政部财政科学研究所,北京100142 [2]绍兴市委党校,浙江绍兴312300
出 处:《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》2013年第12期3-14,61,共13页Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(70973115);国家软科学研究计划项目(2010GXS5D210)
摘 要:地方政府竞争引致污染红利的内在机理表现如下:首先,地方政府竞争会导致政府污染规制乏力;其次,政府污染规制乏力会导致污染红利。利用我国2001-2011年的省级面板数据对之进行实证检验,结果证实了上述研究结果的正确性,具体体现在:表征地方政府竞争的三个变量对污染红利的回归系数均为正数,且显著性极强,说明我国地方政府竞争对污染红利的增加具有正向影响;分地区回归结果显示,东、中、西部三个地区的地方政府竞争均导致了污染红利增加;地方政府竞争视角下的污染红利与人均收入不具库兹涅茨特征而呈现一种正向的线性关系。The mechanism of pollution dividend caused by local government competition is as followed: (1) local government competition can lead inefficiency in pollution regulation (2) pollu- tion regulation inefficiency will cause pollution dividend. By using provincial-level panel data from 2001 to 2011, we make an empirical test, the result confirms the correctness of research conclu- sion. Firstly, the three variables characterized by local government competition cause more pollu- tion dividend, it turns out that competition has a positive effect on the increase in pollution divi- dend. Secondly, regional recession result shows that local government competition of eastern, cen- tral and western regions causes more pollution dividend. Thirdly, the relations between pollution dividend and per capita income is not a Kuznets curve hut a positive and linear relationship from the perspective of local government competition.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143