检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古财经大学经济学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010070
出 处:《内蒙古财经大学学报》2013年第6期1-5,共5页Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Finance and Economics
摘 要:在对经济学界关于经济学学派划分标准进行阐述的基础上,归纳分析了国内外学者关于发展经济学流派的划分观点。学者们普遍接受将发展经济学划分为结构主义经济发展思路、新古典主义经济发展思路、新古典政治经济学思路和激进主义经济发展思路。本文对上述四种思路的研究方法进行了分析,并明确指出上述几种思路研究方法分歧的本质,即"单一经济学"和"双元经济学"之争、发展中国家经济发展的"内因"与"外因"之争、对经济发展进行"纯经济研究"还是进行"社会经济系统研究"之争。This paper explains the economic circles division standards about school of economics, and on this basis,introduces the domestic and foreign scholars" points about the division of development economics schools. Scholars generally accept the following development ideas, that is, development economics is divided into structural- ism, neoclassical economics, new classical political economics and activist economic development. The paper analy- zes the idea of the four research methods in detail. Last the article explicitly points out the nature of the differences above several research methods, those are the debate about "a single economics" and "the dual economic", the controversy about "internal cause" and "external cause" of economic development in developing countries ,and contention on economic development "pure economic research" or "social economic system research".
分 类 号:F09[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7