检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗圆[1] 姚令侃[1,2,3] 朱颖[4] 杨明[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学土木工程学院,四川成都610031 [2]抗震工程技术四川省重点实验室道路与铁道工程抗震技术研究所,四川成都610031 [3]高速铁路线路工程教育部重点实验室,四川成都610031 [4]中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川成都610031
出 处:《西南交通大学学报》2013年第6期1008-1015,1023,共9页Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University
基 金:铁道部科技研究开发计划课题资助项目(2011G011-A);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(41030742)
摘 要:为了解决传统铁路选线设计方案评价方法没有考虑不同宏观经济形势的影响,并且对于一些不能完全用货币衡量的环境影响和社会效益等定性指标难以进行定量化研究的问题,引入效用理论以及多属性决策中的投影法,在专家采用语言变量对定性指标进行评价的基础上,将定性指标转化为区间数,再通过定义效用函数对宏观经济的影响效果进行量化,建立了不同宏观经济形势影响下的线路方案评价模型.根据该模型,通过使用不同的经济环境因子k来选择与其对应最优的线路方案.最后通过一个局部走向方案的比选实例说明了模型的作业程式,为新形势下铁路选线设计的方案选择提供了一种新的综合评价方法.Traditional scheme comparison methods for railway route selection have not taken into account the impact of different macroeconomic situations on the optimal selection of railway locations. Besides,there still exist operational difficulties in qualification of indicators that cannot be measured by money. To overcome these defects,the utility theory and projection method were introduced into optimal selection of railway location designs in this work. Firstly,interval numbers were introduced to quantify qualitative indicators after experts evaluated alternatives using linguistic variables. Then,by defining utility functions to quantify the impact of macroeconomic situation,a model of route scheme evaluation in different macroeconomic situations was established. From this model,the optimum scheme could be selected by using different economic environmental factor k. Finally,an example of local alignment scheme comparison was used to illustrate the operation procedure of the model. This work provided a new and synthetic evaluating model for optimal railway route scheme selection in railway location design.
分 类 号:U212.32[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程] F532.8[经济管理—产业经济]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222