检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学附属东方肝胆外科医院,上海200438
出 处:《药学实践杂志》2013年第6期478-480,共3页Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice
摘 要:目的分析中药非处方药口服液多剂量包装制剂的给药剂量计量方法,并调查公众理解和认知的准确性,为合理用药提供参考。方法汇总常用中药菲处方药口服液多剂量包装制剂单次用量计量方法,随机调查门诊患者对给药指示的理解和认知。结果 45个多剂量包装品规中配备量杯的11个(占24%),31个(69%)包装瓶上有计量刻度,3个(6.7%)既没有配备量杯,瓶子也没有刻度。接受调查的52位门诊患者中有49位(94%)能正确理解量杯定量操作,但对包装瓶刻度不甚理解且错误率较高。结论非处方药口服液制剂单次给药剂量计量方法多样,公众理解和认知度差异大,存在用药安全隐患。建议完善药品包装,配备剂量计量工具。药师应进行用药指导,保证非处方药的安全使用。Objective To examine the dose measurement methods of popular oral liquid OTC TCM, and to evaluate the recognition accuracy of patient. Methods The types and features of oral liquid measurement methods provided with packages obtained from hos- pital pharmacies were recorded and outpatients were selected randomly to assess the accuracy rate of dose measuring. Results Of the 45 oral liquid OTC TCM multiple-dosage package products, only 11 (24%) provided a dosing cup with package,31 (69%)provided mark on bottles,3(6.7% )provided none of them. 49 (94%) outpatients could measure accurately using dosing cup while resulted in wrong dosage by the mark on bottles because of variable marked volume. Conclusion Results suggest that dosing measurement variability presented a challenge to patient operation, which might result in a medication dosing error, whereas pharmacists should strive to provide understandable care information to promote proper medication use.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62