检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李强[1] 谢经武[1] 李斌[1] 李云[1] 刘锦锦[1]
机构地区:[1]潍坊医学院附属平度市人民医院,山东青岛266700
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2013年第12期944-946,共3页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)中应用加速康复外科(fast track surgery,FTS)理念的可行性。方法:将2012年5月至2013年7月收治的67例LA患者随机分为FTS组与传统LA组,对比两组患者术后排气时间、进食时间、下床活动时间及住院时间、住院费用、并发症等指标。结果:FTS组术后恢复时间、术后住院时间明显缩短(P<0.05),住院费用显著降低(P<0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:LA术中应用FTS理念可加速患者术后康复,降低住院费用,安全、经济、有效,值得进一步推广。Objective: To explore the feasibility of using fast track surgery (FTS) concept in laparoscopic appendectomy. Methods :From May 2012 to Jul. 2013,67 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy were randomly divided into two groups: FTS group and traditional group. Outcomes were assessed by postoperative recovery time (first exhaust, eating, out-of-bed activity ) , postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization costs and postoperative complications. Results:Compared to traditional group, the postoperative recovery time and hospital stay of FTS group were shorter ( P 〈 0.05 ) , and the hospitalization costs of FTS group was fewer ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The postoperative complications were of no significant difference ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions : Postoperative recovery time is shorter and hospitalization costs is fewer in laparoscopic appendectomy with FTS compared to traditional group. Using FTS concept in laparoscopic appendectomy is safe, economic and effective,is worth further popularization.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117