全程录音录像制度的功能异化——以侦查讯问录音录像的选择性录制与播放为视角  

Functional Alienation of the Full Audio and Video Recording System——From the Perspective of Selective Recording and Playing of Audio and Video Recording in Investigative Interrogation

作　　者：王超[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第1期63-72,共10页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA820069)

摘　　要：尽管我国推行全程录音录像制度的主要目标在于遏制刑讯逼供,但是在侦查机关选择性录制录音录像和检察机关选择性播放录音录像的情况下,全程录音录像制度的运用却出现了本末倒置的结果,即全程录音录像制度在遏制刑讯逼供方面的功能不仅难以得到实现,反而在应对被告人翻供或者辩护人申请排除非法证据方面的作用被无限放大。为了更好地实现全程录音录像制度的遏制功能,我国不仅需要改革现行的全程录音录像制度,而且有必要对相关的侦查程序、辩护制度、证据规则做出相应的调整。The main objective of implementing the full audio and video recording system is to curb torture in China. However, when investigative organizations selectively record audios and videos and People＇ s Procu- ratorates selectively play audio and video recording materials, the implememation of the full audio and video recording system leads to the result of getting the cart before the horse. One the one hand, it is difficult to re- alize the curbing function of the full audio and video recording system. On the other hand, its effects of re- sponding a defendant＇ s overthrowing their confessions and his or her counsel＇ s applying to excluding illegally obtained evidence are hugely magnified. In order to better achieve the curbing function of the full audio and video recording system, China shall reform the existing full audio and video recording system and adjust the relevant investigative procedure, defense system, and evidence rules.

关 键 词：全程录音录像制度 选择性录制 选择性播放 功能异化 

分 类 号：D956.152[政治法律—法学]