检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京市勘察设计研究院有限公司,北京100038
出 处:《隧道建设》2013年第12期989-994,共6页Tunnel Construction
摘 要:为揭示莫尔-库伦模型和修正剑桥模型在模拟盾构施工引起地层位移的不同,以能够反映施工工况的地层损失率为控制参数,采用2种模型模拟盾构施工引起的地层位移,从机制上分析2种模型计算结果的不同,并与Peck公式的计算结果和实测数据进行对比。主要结论如下:1)莫尔-库伦模型计算的隧道中心的最大沉降大于实测数据和Peck公式的计算结果,计算的远离隧道中心处的位移为回弹性质。2)修正剑桥模型计算的最大沉降与实测数据和Peck公式的计算结果基本吻合,但计算的沉降槽宽度偏大。MohrCoulomb model and modified CamClay model are used to simulate the ground displacement induced by shield tunneling, with the ground loss ratio as the control parameter, so as to reveal the differences between the calculation results on basis of these two models. In the paper, the differences between the calculation results on basis of these two models are analyzed. Furthermore, the calculation results on basis of these two models are compared with those on basis of Peck formula and the measured data. Conclusions drawn are as follows: 1) The maximum settlement at the tunnel center line calculated on basis of MohrCoulomb model is larger than that calculated on basis of Peck formula and the measured data. The calculated displacement far away from the tunnel center line displays rebound property. 2) The maximum settlement calculated on basis of modified CamClay model agrees with that calculated on basis of Peck formula and the measured data, but the width of the settlement trough calculated is slightly larger.
关 键 词:北京地铁 莫尔-库伦模型 修正剑桥模型 地层损失率 PECK公式 数值模拟
分 类 号:U45[建筑科学—桥梁与隧道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.218.204