检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沈烽[1] 张健[1] 黄源[1] 吴颖坤[1] 金樑[1] 张青[1] 刘荣[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院,上海200092
出 处:《中国药房》2014年第1期31-33,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:促进药品供应商提高药品配送服务意识。方法:合理制订供应商评分标准,并将该标准通过软件设计嵌入医院电子化药品物流平台(ePS)建立供应商评分系统,将药品采购过程如供应商资质管理、订单处理、可供货率、验收效率、质量药品处理效率等通过扫描设备进行记录及进行数据处理,比较我院采用ePS前(2009年)、后(2011年)供应商评分系统的相关数据。结果:在ePS平台上可客观记录任意时间段供应商物流服务水平数据。与2009年比较,2011年验收效率提高了201%,药品质量问题处理能力提高了24%、处理天数效率提高了63%。结论:ePS供应商评分系统的运用可促进供应商物流配送服务能力的提高,同时可作为医院对药品供应商进行选择或淘汰的依据。OBJECTIVE : To strengthen the suppliers' awareness of providing drug logistics service consciously. METHODS: The supplier marking standard was drew up reasonably, which was integrated into Electronic pharmaceutical supplies (ePS) by spe- cific soitware to put up supplier marking system. The drug procurement data such as supplier qualifications, order processing, avail- able delivery rate, acceptance check efficiency and unqualified products treatment efficiency by scanning equipments were recorded and processed. The data of supplier marking system were compared before (2009) and after (2011) the application of ePS. RE- SULTS: ePS recorded the suppliers' service level over all time objectively. The acceptance check efficiency raised by 201%, while the unqualified products treatment capability raised by 24% and treatment efficiency raised by 63% in 2011 compared with 2009. CONCLUSIONS: The ePS supplier marking system can raise the suppliers' drug logistics efficiency and supplier marking system can provide reference for supplier selection and elimination in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51