检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京青云航空仪表有限公司,北京100191 [2]北京航空航天大学可靠性与环境工程技术重点实验室,北京100191
出 处:《计算机应用》2013年第A02期238-240,共3页journal of Computer Applications
摘 要:通过分析、总结已有的危险分析技术,将系统理论过程分析(STPA)方法与其他方法相比较,总结、形成了软件安全性技术框架。其次,对比已有的分析方法,明确了一种适合软件密集系统的危险分析方法。最后使用STPA方法对飞机除冰系统进行了分析研究,证明了方法的可行性。Most software safety methods are targeted at the accident of component failure. However, studies have shown an increasing number of accidents are caused by the non-functional interactions between components rather than components failures. To solve this problem, a new method called STPA (System Theory Process Analysis) was proposed by Nancy G. Leveson fellow and gradually drew attention. This article analyzed and summarized the existing technology, comparing the STPA with them, to create the software safety technology framework. Secondly, by analyzing these methods and comparing them, a hazard analysis method for software-intensive systems was dearly determined. Finally, this article used an example of analyzing the deicing system to verify the feasibility of the method.
分 类 号:TP311.5[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.227.140.134