检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋彬龄[1]
出 处:《体育科学》2014年第1期48-53,共6页China Sport Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(11CFX076);湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助项目
摘 要:兴奋剂检测本身就有侵权的风险,未成年人的自我保护意识和能力都较弱,对未成年人进行的兴奋剂检测更容易发生侵权,但我国并没有特别的法律、法规对此问题加以规制。对兴奋剂检测的规制应该在宪法的框架下进行,兴奋剂检测属于搜查行为,应符合宪法对搜查的要求。同时,对于未成年人的兴奋剂检测应当设置一些特殊的保护机制,如适当成年人介入制度、侵权信息记录制度、多部门的合作制度等,并设立专门的未成年运动员权益保护机构。我国应重视兴奋剂检测的侵权危险,在法律上明确对未成年人兴奋剂检测的基本要求,加强保护未成年人权益的配套制度建设。The doping test always has the risk of tort. As the juvenile is weak in the self-pro- tection consciousness? and ability, the doping test on juvenile is more easy to cause tort. There is no special law on this question in China. The regulation of doping test should under the framework of constitution. The doping test constitutes a search'and should subject to the de- mands of the constitution. At the same time, it should set the special protection mechanism for the juvenile under the doping test, like the mechanism of appropriate adult participation, the in- cidents recording and reporting and the multi sector cooperation. It should set the special insti- tution to protect the juvenile athletes. In China, it should pay more attention to the risk of tort in the doping test, clarify the basic requirement to the doping test on juvenile in the law and set more supporting measures to protect the right of juvenile.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3