中外档案学科学者引证行为比较分析  

Comparative analysis of the cite behaviours in Chinese and foreign archival scholars

作　　者：杨思洛[1] 关影[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学公共管理学院,湘潭411105

出　　处：《档案学通讯》2014年第1期23-30,共8页Archives Science Bulletin

基　　金：国家社科基金“中外图书情报学科知识图谱比较研究(11CTQ015)”的阶段性成果

摘　　要：选择中外档案学领域典型期刊近十年的数据,从引文量、引文类型、高被引期刊、高被引作者、引用半衰期等方面比较分析国内外学者引证行为,得出:国内引文总量高于国外,但附引率和篇均引文量低于国外,外文在国内档案学论文中的引用越来越多;国内引文数量集中区间长于国外,但高引文量的论文篇数低于国外;期刊论文、图书、史料和网络文献是档案学学者主要的引用来源,网络文献的引用越来越多;国内档案学高被引文献大多为专著,国外则多为期刊论文;《档案学通讯》和Restaurator分别是国内外档案学者引用最多的期刊;冯惠玲和Neevel JG分别是国内外被引频次最高的档案学者;国内档案学者倾向于引用新文献,国外档案学引文半衰期比国内长。By applying bibliometrics, choosing typical archives journals at home and abroad, this paper makes an analysis about the citation,style of citation,high-cited periodicals,high-cited authors and half-life of citation. It shows that the total domestic citation are higher than abroad, more and more foreign litera- tures are cited by domestic scholars; The domestic citation concentration interval is longer than abroad, but the number of papers of high citation is lower than abroad; Journal, general book, historical data and net- work are the main sources of domestic archives; The half-life abroad are longer than domestic and so on.

关 键 词：引证行为 引文分析 引文半衰期 档案学 

分 类 号：G270[文化科学—档案学]