检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]曲靖市第一人民医院骨一科,云南曲靖655000
出 处:《临床骨科杂志》2013年第6期611-613,共3页Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
摘 要:目的观察脊髓型颈椎病前路减压手术中后纵韧带切除的疗效。方法按治疗方法将41例行颈椎前路减压患者分为2组:后纵韧带切除者20例(切除组),未切除者21例(保留组),同时行前路钢板内固定融合,比较两种方式的疗效。结果 41例均获随访,时间13~32(18.0±1.6)个月。两组术前JOA评分、失血量、手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);JOA评分恢复率切除组76.2%±21.6%,保留组63.7%±21.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论颈椎前路减压后行增生后纵韧带切除使病变节段减压更加彻底,有利于患者的神经功能恢复。Objective To observe the effect of posterior longitudinal ligament resection for cervical spondylotic myelopathy by anterior decompression. Methods 41 patients with anterior cervical decompression were divided into 2 groups, the resection of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 20 patients (resection group), 21 patients without resection ( reserved group). Results 41 patients were followed up for 13 - 32 ( 18.0 ± 1.6) months. Two groups of preoperative JOA score, blood losss and operation time were no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The spinal cord neurologic function recovery rate of posterior longitudinal ligament resection group were 74. 1% ± 21.6%. It was better than posterior longitudinal ligament reserve group 63.6% ± 19.3% (P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions The complete decompression can be obtained by posterior longitudinal ligament resection. This technique is to the benefit of neural function recovery.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.31.104