检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院骨科一病区,合肥230022
出 处:《中国修复重建外科杂志》2014年第1期109-112,共4页Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
摘 要:目的总结人工全膝关节置换术中高屈曲型与普通型膝关节假体的比较研究进展,为临床选择提供参考。方法广泛查阅近年有关高屈曲型与普通型膝关节假体置换的比较研究文献,并进行总结分析。结果高屈曲型与普通型膝关节假体术后膝关节活动范围及并发症方面的比较仍存在许多争议,而关节功能及满意度方面比较无显著差异。结论高屈曲型膝关节假体的选择应综合考虑,其疗效有待进一步随访明确。Objective To summarize the research progress of the difference between high-flexion prosthesis and conventional prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty, so as to offer a reference for clinical choice of prosthesis. Methods The relevant literature on high-flexion prosthesis and conventional prosthesis in recent years was extensively reviewed and analyzed. Results There are some controversies in range of motion and complications between high-flexion prosthesis and conventional prosthesis; while no obvious difference is found in knee function and satisfaction. Conclusion Comprehensive evaluation should be considered when high-flexion prosthesis is selected; and the effectiveness needs further follow-up.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.188