机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院肾脏科,200127
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2013年第48期3826-3830,共5页National Medical Journal of China
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB517602);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2011BA110804、2011BA110808)
摘 要:目的探讨影响狼疮性肾炎患者疗效及复发的相关因素。方法对2003年1月至2010年12月上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院肾脏科诊断为增殖型及膜型狼疮性肾炎患者进行回顾性分析,统计患者临床病史、生化检查、免疫学指标及病理分型。根据患者是否缓解分为完全缓解(CR)组、部分缓解(PR)组和治疗无效(NR)组;根据复发情况分为复发组和未复发组,并对以上数据进行分析。结果(1)共入选105例患者,其中男6例,女99例,平均随访(51±30)个月,86例于治疗6个月后得到缓解。(2)CR组(36例)、PR组(50例)、NR组(19例)患者起病时24h尿蛋白[1.7(1.4~3.8)、4.7(3.1~7.6)、3.0(2.3~5.9)g,P〈0.01]、血肌酐[58.1(53.0—70.9)、67.5(53.5~129.1)、128.9(69.9~184.3)μmol/L,P〈0.01]、血清白蛋白f30.6(27.8~34.6)、22.4(19.3~29.4)、23.1(18.9~28.6)g/L,P〈0.01)、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)[128.4(107.5—156.5)、110.3(51.9—145.7)、62.4(34.8~120.3)ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1,P〈0.01]、活动性指数评分(AI)和慢性化指数评分(CI)差异有统计学意义。(3)86例缓解患者中,随访(40.5±22.5)个月,20例(23.3%)出现复发,平均复发时间为(30.6±18.6)个月,复发组患者维持期单用激素率明显高于未复发组(15.0%比1.5%,P〈0.05)、依从性也较差(40.0%比9.1%,P〈0.01);多元回归分析表明,维持期单用激素治疗是复发的独立危险因素。结论影响患者缓解的因素有起病时尿蛋白量、血肌酐、血白蛋白、eGFR和AI评分。维持期单用激素治疗是狼疮性肾炎患者复发的独立危险因素,患者治疗依从性差可能是复发的主要影响因素之一,提高患者治疗依从性及在维持期使用激素联�Objective To explore the related factors of remission and relapse in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. Methods A retrospective study was conducted for proliferation and membrane LN patients diagnosed from 2003 to 2010. Their clinical, laboratory and pathological parameters were collected. According to the response to treatment, they were divided into 3 groups of complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) and no response (NR). Those in remission were divided into 2 groups of relapsing and non- relapsing during maintenance period. Associated factors for remission and relapse were analyzed. Results ( 1 ) Among a total of 105 patients, there were 99 females and 6 males with an average follow-up period of (51 -+ 30) months. Eighty-six patients achieved remission after 6-month treatment. (2) The outcomes were CR (n =36), PR (n =50) and NR (n = 19). Proteinuria in PR group was higher than that in CR group (4. 7 (3.1 - 7.6) vs 1.7 ( 1.4 - 3.8), P 〈 0. 01 ) while proteinuria of CR group was lower than that of NR group (1.7 (1.4 -3.8) vs 3.0 (2.3 -5.9), P 〈0.01). Serum albumin level of CR group was significantly higher than those of PR ( 30. 6 ( 27.8 - 34. 6 ) vs 22. 4 ( 19.3 - 29.4 ), P 〈 0. 01 ) and NR groups (30. 6 (27.8 - 34. 6) vs 23.1 ( 18.9 - 28.6), P 〈 0. 01 ). Serum creatinine was significantly higher in NR group than those of CR (128.9 (69. 9 - 184. 3) vs 58. 1 (53.0 -70. 9) , P 〈 0. 01 ) and PR group ( 128.9 (69.9 - 184. 3 ) vs 67. 5 (53.5 - 129.1 ), P 〈 0. 05 ). Acute index (AI) and chronic index (CI) were lower in CR group than those of PR and NR groups. (3) A total of 86 cases achieved remission (CR/PR) while 20 cases (23.3%) had relapse. During the maintenance period, the relapse rate was higher in the group on prednisone alone than those on combined therapy of prednisone plus immunosuppressant (P 〈0. 05). Sixty patients (90. 9% ) in non-relapse group a
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...