检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟颖[1]
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期77-85,共9页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:中国法学会2013年度部级法学研究课题"中小企业社会责任法律制度研究"(CLS2013D155)
摘 要:推动公司社会责任落实的途径有很多,但司法化无疑是推动其有效落实的最有效的方式之一。司法依据的明确和诉讼规则的健全是公司社会责任司法化实现的前提性要件。《公司法》第五条是公司社会责任内容复杂性的折射,也是公司法适应性品格的体现。围绕第五条的价值宣示,我们可以从司法化依据的明确、诉讼规则的完善、公司社会责任司法建议制度的构建、法官商业素养的培养四方面来推动公司社会责任的司法化。Among many ways to promote the implementation of corporate social responsibility,judicialization is with- out doubt one of the most effective. Clear definition of the foundation of judieialization and the perfection of the pro- cedural rules are the prerequisite to the judicialization of corporate social responsibility. Article 5 of the Company Law is not only a reflection of the complexity of corporate social responsibility, but also a manifestation of the adap- tive character of the law. Based on Article 5, we can promote the judicialization of corporate social responsibility from the following four aspects, namely, clearly defining the foundation of judicialization, perfecting the procedure rules, constructing the mechanism of judicial proposals of the corporate social responsibility, and cultivating business literacy of judges.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.18