检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶小丽[1]
出 处:《西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)》2014年第1期86-89,共4页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:随着社会的高速发展,"形成中的权利"越来越多地被诉至法院。出于法官自身安全性的考虑,法院多将其因"法无明文规定"而拒绝受理或暂缓受理。为维护公民的合法权益,发挥法律维护社会秩序的功能,法院应以诉的利益之有无为标准决定对"形成中的权利"是否受理。在方法上,应运用法解释学、权利分层理论以及违法性判断来确定具体的"形成中的权利"是否具有实体法依据;在制度上,应建立有效的案例指导制度来指导司法审判实践和统一司法审判标准。With the rapid development of society, increasing number of lawsuits are filed concerning the forming rights. In order to protect the judges, the courts usually reject or suspend considering such cases in the name of "No Stipulation in Explicit Terms". However, to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and to exert the function of law in maintaining social order, the court should decide whether or not to consider a case based on the interests of action. In method, the court should decide whether specific forming rights have any legal basis in terms of substantive law through law hermeneutics, right stratification theory and judgment about illegality. Institutionally, the court should establish effective case guiding system to guide the practice of judicial judgment and form a consist- ent judicial standard.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74