检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张积储
出 处:《石家庄经济学院学报》2013年第6期133-136,共4页Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics
摘 要:日前,电信三大运营商与腾讯的"微信收费之争"掀起了网络经济的垄断浪潮。在网络经济的时代下,瓶颈垄断经济越来越多,我国《反垄断法》应该对这种瓶颈垄断行为作出相应的规定,规范优势企业的市场行为。将以微信收费的争端为线索,引出瓶颈垄断的概念,浅析我国垄断法对瓶颈垄断的规制,突出瓶颈垄断行为应受规制的必要性,并提出瓶颈垄断反垄断法规制的立法建议。Recently,the " micro-channel charge dispute" between three major telecom operators and Tencent set off a wave of the Internet economy monopoly. In the network economy era,the bottleneck monopoly of the economy is becoming more and more,China’s " anti-monopoly law" should make corresponding regulations aganist the bottleneck monopoly,standardize the market behavior of dominant companies. This study takes the dispute of microchannel charge as clues to introduce the concept of monopoly bottlenecks,analyzes the regulation against the bottleneck monopoly,highlights the necessity of regulation. Finally,some legislation recommandations are proposed for regulating the bottleneck monopoly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.218.110.116