国家理论:诺思与马克思的比较  

State Theory: The Comparison of North and Marx

作　　者：舒展[1] 崔园园[1] 

机构地区：[1]福州大学马克思主义学院,福建福州350002

出　　处：《贵阳学院学报（社会科学版）》2013年第6期31-35,共5页Journal of Guiyang University:Social Sciences

摘　　要：在国家的起源问题上,诺思是在批判"契约论"和"掠夺论"的基础上形成了自己的"暴力潜能"理论,他对国家模型的论述是建立在经济分析的基础上的,因此有着深厚的历史唯物主义的基础。在国家的本质问题上,诺思认为国家是博弈规则的制定者,其本质在于对产权的界定和行使,而马克思认为国家植根于市民社会,国家的本质是其阶级性。由于两人研究的角度不同,其对国家职能的认识也有差异。This paper mainly discusses consensus and divergence in the state theory between Marx and North, the repre- sentative figure of new institutional economics. On the origin of the country, North formed his own theory of ＂potential of violence＂ on the basis of criticizing ＂contract theory＂ and ＂plunder theory＂, his discuss of national model is based on the economic analysis, thus there is profound foundation of historical materialism. On the nature of the country, North thought state is the framers of the game rules, its essence lies in the definition and exercise of property rights, yet Marx believed the country is rooted in the civil society, so the essence of state is class nature. Due to the perspective of them, there also is different understanding of national function.

关 键 词：国家理论 诺思 马克思 

分 类 号：D03[政治法律—政治学]