检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京石油化工学院人文社科学院,北京102617 [2]韩国庆熙大学酒店与观光学院,韩国首尔130701
出 处:《商业研究》2014年第1期179-184,共6页Commercial Research
基 金:国家社科基金项目"建设世界旅游强国制度创新研究";项目编号:13BJY144
摘 要:本文选取全国百强旅行社中前30位旅行社,与韩国经营出境游业务旅行社中前30位旅行社作为研究对象,采用目的 -价值矩阵下的分析指标及Ho的β指数,对中国与韩国代表性旅行社网站内容进行比较研究。中国旅行社和韩国旅行社网站β指数分别为7.0919和8.3089,表明中韩两国代表性旅行社网站内容已处于较高水平,其中韩国旅行社网站β指数较高,说明韩国旅行社网站为旅游者提供内容更详尽、实现价值更高,具有借鉴和参考价值。从目的 -价值矩阵具体指标来看,两国代表性旅行社网站内容存在异同。The purpose of this study is to compare the main characteristics of tour operator's website contents between China and South Korea by selecting Top 30 Chinese tour operators and Top 30 Korean tour operators. To achieve this goal, Ho's 13 index was calculated based on purpose- value frame and the indices were compared between China and South Korea. As a result of analysis, the websiteβ indices are 7. 0919 and 8. 3089, showing both Chinese and South Ko- rean tour operator websites are in higher level in web contents. Moreover, Chinese tour operator websites are a little less information- oriented compared with South Korean tour operator websites. Specific targets from the objective value ma- trix, there are differences in tour operator website contents between them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249