检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际检验医学杂志》2014年第1期80-82,共3页International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
摘 要:目的评价4种不同的检测系统检测乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)的分析灵敏度。方法用雅培化学发光免疫分析系统(A)、罗氏电化学发光免疫分析系统(B)、博阳光激化学发光免疫分析系统(C)、科华酶联免疫吸附试验试剂(D)和BioTek酶标仪(ELX-800)等4种检测系统分别测定用健康人血清配制的WHO HBsAg系列浓度标准品和140例临床弱阳性样本,分析比较各检测系统的分析灵敏度,并对结果进行分析。结果 A、B、C、D 4种检测系统cutoff值所对应的WHO参考品的浓度值分别为0.028、0.044、0.187、0.485IU/mL。结论 4种检测系统的分析灵敏度排序为A>B>C>D。Objective To compare the analytical sensitivities of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg) determined by four different immunoassay systems. Methods WHO HBsAg series concentration standard preparations prepared by healthy human serum 140 HBsAg weakly positive samples were measured by four immunoassay systems(a direct chemiluminescence assay-Abbott, system B for electrochemiluminescence assay-Roche,system C light initiated chemiluminescence assay-beyond, D enzyme-linked immunosor- bent assay(ELISA) reader-BioTek ELX-800 and reagent based ELISA-KHB). The analytical sensitivities of each detection system were analysed and compared. Results The corresponding WHO standard preparations concentration values of the cutoff values de- termined with A.B.C and D detection systems were 0. 028,0. 044,0. 187 and 0. 485 IU/mL respectively. Conclusion The order of the analytical sensitivities determined by four immunoassay systems as follows: A〉B〉C〉D.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117