《侵权责任法》的价值悖反及批判  

Criticism of Value Judgments of Tort Law of China

作　　者：王永霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学法学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《法学论坛》2014年第1期121-130,共10页Legal Forum

摘　　要：侵权法的价值判断存在工具主义和伦理主义两种进路的分歧,《侵权责任法》以救济功能为首要功能,并以之作为价值判断的最终准则,采取的是工具主义进路。但是《侵权责任法》并未形成价值判断的融贯性,出现了诸多背离这一价值判断立场的制度和规则设计。更重要的是,对这一价值判断立场的正当化论证并不充分。与纯粹的伦理主义进路一样,纯粹的工具主义进路必然存在难以克服的不足之处,其最大的弊端是抽离伦理要素,法律难以成为被信仰的对象。There are two approaches in value judgments of tort law. One is instrumentalism, the other is ethics. Tort Law of China puts the relief function on the most important position, and makes it the basic principle of value judgments. However, there is much violation of this standpoint in Tort Law of China. More importantly, legislators and scholars can＇ t offer adequate grounds to justify this standpoint. The pure instrumentalism approach has many shortages, the most serious one of which is that people have less faith in the law.

关 键 词：侵权 侵权责任法 价值判断 

分 类 号：D913.7[政治法律—民商法学]