拨偏与复位:坚持党的领导与司法自主之关系探究  

Diviation and Rectification: the Relationship between Party's Leadership and Judicial Independence

作　　者：吴展[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海海关学院法律系,上海201318

出　　处：《河北法学》2014年第2期65-74,共10页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目<中国特色社会主义司法制度>(09 QZD 062);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目<区域法治研究>(10YJC820120);教育部2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心"司法运行过程研究团队研究成果;上海海关学院优秀青年教师基金(2312027)

摘　　要：究其本质而言,坚持党的领导与司法自主之关系属于政治与司法的关系问题。由于坚持党的领导与司法自主存在所追求合法性内容的不同,其关系存在紧张乃至抵牾的可能。在我国处于转型时期的当下,由于党对合法性资源的追求处于不断变化的过程中,在处理坚持党的领导与司法自主方面出现了"泛政治化"、"去政治化"两种不良趋向。在法治框架下,构建坚持党的领导与司法自主之良性关系,需要同时进行政治法治化、司法技术化,使得司法在党的领导下复归其本源特性。In the essence, the relation between party~ leadership and judicial independence belongs to the issue of the relation between politics and judiciary. There exists the possibility of tension since party＇s leadership and judicial independence focus on two different kinds of legitimacy. On the contemporary transitional China, since the process of the party＇s pursuing legitimacy is flexible, there are two trends of ＂pan politician＂ and ＂ depolitician＂ dealing with the relation between party＇s leadership and judicial independence. Under the constitutional framework, in order to shape the good relationship between party~ leadership and judicial independence, we need simultaneously precede the process of political legalization and judicial technicalization. Only by that can the judicial return to its original system under the leadership of the party.

关 键 词：合法性 合法律性 泛政治化 去政治化 政治法治化 司法技术化 

分 类 号：DF02[政治法律—法学理论]