检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津医院急诊科,天津300210
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2014年第2期347-348,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:天津市医药卫生重点学科攻关基金项目(10KG118)
摘 要:目的对比观察莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星和头孢哌酮/舒巴坦在社区获得性肺炎抗感染治疗中的临床疗效及安全性,以降低感染率。方法将180例社区获得性肺炎患者随机分成A、B、C 3组,每组各60例,分别给予莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星、头孢哌酮/舒巴坦静脉滴注治疗,比较3组的临床疗效及安全性。结果 3组的总有效率分别为95.00%、80.00%和78.33%,3组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),莫西沙星组的总有效率高于左氧氟沙星组(χ2=6.17,P<0.05)及头孢哌酮/舒巴坦组(χ2=7.21,P<0.05);3组的细菌清除率分别为93.33%、74.42%和70.45%,3组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),莫西沙星组的细菌清除率均高于其余两组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),不良反应发生率分别为5.00%、8.33%和6.67%,3组比较差异无统计学意义。结论莫西沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎安全、有效,值得临床推广应用。OBJECTIVE To compare and observe the clinical efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, cef- perazone-sulbactam in the treatment of comnmnity-acquired pneumonia(CAP) so as to reduce the infection rate. METHODS A total of 180 CAP patients were randomly divided into the group A, B, and C, with 60 cases in each; then the group A was given the intravenous administration of moxifloxacin, the group B treated with the intrave- nous administration of levofloxacin, the group C treated with the intravenous administration of cefoperazone-sul- bactam; the clinical efficacy and safety were observed and compared between the three groups. RESULTS The total effective rate was 95.00% in the group A, 80.00% in the group B, 78.33% in the group C, the difference be- tween the three groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05); the total effective rate of the moxifloxacin group was higher than that of the levofloxacin group (χ2= 6.17,P〈0.05) and the cefoperazone-sulbactam group (χ2 = 7.21,P〈0.05). The bacterial clearance rate was 93.33% in the group A, 74.42% in the group B, 70.45% in the group C, the difference between the three groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05); the bacterial clearance rate of the moxifloxacin group was higher than that of other two groups, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 5.00% in the group A, 8.33% in the group B, 6.67% in the group C, the difference between the three groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Moxifloxacin is ef- fective and safe for the treatment of CAP, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222