中国大学生情感、动作隐喻产出对比研究  

Comparison of Chinese Adults' Action and Emotion Metaphoric Production

作　　者：刘振前[1] 石磊[2] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学外国语学院,山东济南250010 [2]山东财经大学外国语学院,山东济南250010

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2013年第6期8-15,共8页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基　　金：2012年国家社科基金<中国大中小学生认知隐喻能力发展研究>(项目编号:12BYY049);山东省社会科学规划研究项目<大中小学生英语学习观念体系隐喻路径研究>(项目编号:09CWXJ24);<山东省青少年创新思维能力发展状况研究>(项目编号:12CQSJ03)的部分研究成果

摘　　要：本研究从认知隐喻学角度,运用隐喻产出问卷,对不同目标域(动作、情感)与引导词("是"、"像")对中国大学生隐喻产出的影响进行了研究。结果发现,在相同目标域中,比喻性的"像"比名词性的"是",引导出更多的隐喻;在相同引导词条件下,情感域比动作域引导出更多的隐喻。较之名词式引导词"是",比较式引导词"像"激发的隐喻产出可理解性与恰当性较高,而新奇性较低;较之动作域,情感域引导的隐喻产出可理解性与恰当性较高,而新奇性较低;较之模糊隐喻,透明隐喻的可理解性与恰当性较高,新奇性较低。同时,从所收集的语料可以看出,人们对于动作这样的概念经常通过形象的动物隐喻来理解;产出的概念隐喻多于概念转喻。This study is a comparison of Chinese adults＇ metaphoric production between different targets （actions vs. emotions） and under different instruction types （A is B vs. A is like B）. The results of the study show that the comparative instruction triggers more metaphors than the nominal one, and emotion targets elicit more metaphors than action ones. The comparative condition elicited metaphors are rated as more comprehensible and appropriate, but less novel than the nominal condition elicited. Metaphors produced for the emotion targets are judged as more comprehensible, more appropriate, but less novel than those for action targets. Transparent metaphors are judged as more comprehensible, more appropriate, but less novel than those opaque ones. What is more, many animal meta- phors are used to constitute action concept, and the number of conceptual metonymies is smaller than that of conceptual metaphors.

关 键 词：概念隐喻 隐喻产出 目标域 情感隐喻 动作隐喻 

分 类 号：H05[语言文字—语言学]