最高人民法院司法解释权再思考——兼与郭辉、史景轩博士商榷  

Constitutional Reconsideration of SPC's Judicial Interpretation Authority——Deliberate Concurrently With Doctor Guohui and Shi Jing Xuan

作　　者：苗泳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《河北学刊》2014年第1期169-173,共5页Hebei Academic Journal

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国宪法》第127条蕴含了最高审判机关创造性解释法律的权力,赋予了最高人民法院发展法律、统一司法的双重功能。最高人民法院的创制性司法解释权属于最高司法权的范畴,符合世界司法制度的发展趋势。因此,批评最高人民法院司法解释侵犯立法权的观点,值得商榷。合理行使司法解释权要求从宪法层面明确司法解释权、加强全国人大常委会的监督、减少创制性司法解释的失误、避免利益集团的影响。Article 127 of the Constitution contains the creative power of the highest judicial organ to interpret the law, gives the supreme people＇s court the dual constitutional function of developing law unifying law. SPC＇ s creative judicial interpretation belongs to the category of the supreme judicial power, and is in keeping with the trend of the judicial system. So criticism of SPC＇ s judicial interpretation invading the legislative is open to question. And yet, the powers of the judicial interpretation should be a reasonable exercise, so the power of judicial interpretation should be written clearly in the constitutional law ;the su pervision of the NPC Standing Committee on Judicial Interpretation should be strengthened ; the error of the creative judicial interpretation should be reduced ; the impact of interest groups should be avoided.

关 键 词：司法解释权 创制性司法解释 正当性 政治功能 司法功能 

分 类 号：D926.21[政治法律—法学]