检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国医学创新》2014年第1期43-44,共2页Medical Innovation of China
摘 要:目的:探索经直肠三维超声(3D-TRS)在妇科疾病诊断中的应用,并与经腹超声(TAS)进行比较。方法:随机抽取123例妇科患者,对其行TAS检查,同时采用经阴道容积探头行3D-TRS检查,比较两种检查方法的显像差异,并对患者进行随访,比较两种方法的诊断符合率。结果:3D-TRS在妇科疾病诊断符合率(95.93%)明显高于TAS(60.16%),比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:经直肠三维超声诊断妇科疾病的符合率明显优于TAS,二者联合使用对妇科疾病的早期诊断、鉴别诊断及准确分期具有重要意义。Objective:To discuss the application of diagnosis of by Three dimensional transrectal ultrasound(3D-TRS),and compare with transabdominal ultrasound(TAS).Method:Randomly 123 gynecological patients were selected,they were treated with the TAS examination,at the same time were given transvaginal volume probe 3D-TRS examination.The difference of both imaging and the diagnosis coincidence rate of two methods by follow-up of the patients were compared.Result:The coincidence rate of 3D-TRS(95.93%)was significantly higher than the TAS(60.16%)in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases,the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.01).Conclusion:Diagnostic coincidence rate of 3D-TRS is obviously better than the TAS in the diagnosis of gynecological diseases,and great significance for early diagnosis,differential diagnosis,accurate staging of gynecological diseases by using both of 3D-TRS and TAS.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.42.17