检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学现代物流重庆市重点实验室,重庆400044
出 处:《中国管理科学》2014年第1期65-73,共9页Chinese Journal of Management Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71272085);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(12YJA630135)
摘 要:随着现代物流业的发展,企业将一些业务如运输等外包已经成为参与当今市场竞争的一种手段和趋势,因此考虑包含第三方物流服务提供商(3PL)的供应链更具有现实和理论意义。但是现有文献很少考虑3PL对包含时间因素的变质品供应链模型的影响。基于此,本文建立了一个包含3PL的时变需求变质品三级供应链模型,并运用动态博弈理论求解了该模型的分散式下的均衡解。研究表明与制造商单独承担运输费用相比,由3PL承担运输费用使得产品的订货周期缩短,订货量减少。通过对比分散式决策和集中式决策下的最优解,研究发现考虑系统总体利润情况下,集中式决策的方式不能使该供应链达到协调。最后给出算例验证结论的正确性。With the development of modern logistics industry, business process outsourcing for example transporting and so on has been the trend of enterprise for market competition nowadays. Supply chain models including the third-party logistics service provider (3PL) is more practical and theoretical signifi- cance. But the existing literatures rarely consider the effect of the 3PL provider to the supply chain for the deteriorating items with time-varying. Based on this, a three-level supply chain model including the 3PL for deteriorating items with time-varying demand model is developed. Dynamic game theory is used to solve the decentralized optimal solution. The research shows that compared with the transportation costs borne separately by the manufacturer,the transportation costs borne by the 3PL provider will make the or- der cycle shorter and will reduce the quantity of order in a single cycle. Optimal solutions under the decen- tralized and the centralized are compared, the conclusion implies that considering the total system profit, the centralized decision can't make this supply chain reach coordination. Finally, a numerical example is provided to support the findings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.164.55