缺陷药品侵权责任中的抗辩事由分析  

Analysis of Defense Reasons in Defective Drug Tort Liability

作　　者：张建平[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江医药高等专科学校,浙江宁波315100

出　　处：《中国药房》2014年第5期401-403,共3页China Pharmacy

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题(No.11XKGJ10)

摘　　要：目的:对缺陷药品侵权责任中的抗辩事由进行分析。方法:采用比较研究方法、文献研究方法对可能适用于缺陷药品侵权责任的抗辩事由进行分析,主要包括受害人过错、第三人过错、特殊敏感性、发展风险、未将药品投入流通、投入流通时致损缺陷尚不存在、不可抗力。结果与结论:药品侵权责任案件中,抗辩事由的适用具有一定的特殊性,如不可抗力不能适用;而受害人过错、第三人过错是损害发生的唯一原因时,可以构成免责事由;根据原因力的大小,特殊敏感性可减轻赔偿责任;传统产品责任法中的未将药品投入流通、投入流通时致损缺陷尚不存在、发展风险三大抗辩事由均可以构成免责事由。OBJECTIVE： To provide reference for analysis of special defense reasons in defective drug tort liability. METHODS： By comparative study method and literature research method, potential defense reasons in defective drug tort liability were analyzed, such as contributory fault, the fault of third person, particular susceptibility, development risk, not putting drugs into circulation, not finding defect when circulating, vis major, etc. RESULTS ＆ CONCLUSIONS： In drug tort liability suit, the application of defenses is different from general products liability, such as vis major is not available. When the contributory fault and the fault of third person are the only reason to induce the damage, it is an exemption for defective drug tort. Particular susceptibility could diminish compensation liability according to the power of causative potency. The three defenses in traditional product liability law, containing not putting drugs into circulation, not finding defect when circulating and vis major, could be exemption defenses in drug liability.

关 键 词：药品 抗辩事由 侵权 产品责任 特殊敏感性 

分 类 号：R951[医药卫生—药学]